Make the individual contribution clear and verifiable.
- Scientists and researchers with publications, peer review or research leadership.
- Engineers and technical specialists whose work has industry impact.
- Professionals coordinating employer, institution or independent evidence.
What we coordinate
- Develop an evidence map covering research, technical and professional contributions.
- Distinguish team achievements from the applicant’s own work and responsibility.
- Coordinate authentic supporting records and referee requests.
- Maintain consistency across the career history, evidence index and application narrative.
What to prepare
Begin with a short introduction. Detailed records are collected through the process agreed for the engagement.
- CV, research or professional profile and publication records where relevant.
- Evidence of technical contribution, adoption, leadership or independent recognition.
- Employment, institutional or proposed work arrangements.
What you receive
- A structured contribution and evidence index.
- A document and referee coordination plan.
- A consistency review and questions for the professional adviser.
- An application preparation timetable linked to the chosen route.
How the service works
- 01
Define the contribution
Explain what the applicant personally did and why it matters in the field.
- 02
Gather supporting records
Prioritise contemporaneous records and independent evidence.
- 03
Coordinate professional review
Review the record against the selected route and clarify limitations.
- 04
Prepare a consistent submission
Track documents, translations and supporting statements through the agreed process.
Questions, answered.
Is a publication or citation count enough?
Not on its own. The relevance, quality and context of evidence depend on the route, field and applicable assessment.
Can industry professionals qualify without an academic career?
Some talent routes address industry and professional achievement. The available pathway depends on the person’s actual record and intended activities.
Can confidential technical work be included?
The applicant and employer should agree what may be disclosed. Alternative evidence can be discussed with the professional adviser without exposing protected information.
Will WG write recommendations for referees to sign without review?
Supporting statements must reflect the author’s genuine knowledge and independent judgement. WG can coordinate requests and factual consistency; it does not invent endorsements.
Scope & professional responsibilities
Evidence must accurately identify individual work, sources and permissions. Employer confidentiality and intellectual-property obligations remain applicable.
The engagement sets out deliverables, responsibilities, third-party involvement, fees and milestones before work begins.